NR Eats Young: Buckley Resigns Over Obama Endorsement!

In Chris Buckley's now famous essay, "Sorry, Dad, I'm Voting for Obama," he predicted that the National Review and its readers, following Republican tradition, would cannibalize him for expressing a free thought. Explaining why he was publishing his Obamacanization piece in the Daily Beast rather than the National Review, where he wrote a column until last week, Buckley presciently noted:

Dear Pup once said to me sighfully after a right-winger who fancied himself a WFB protégé had said something transcendently and provocatively cretinous, "You know, I've spent my entire life time separating the Right from the kooks." Well, the dear man did his best. At any rate, I don't have the kidney at the moment for 12,000 emails saying how good it is he's no longer alive to see his Judas of a son endorse for the presidency a covert Muslim who pals around with the Weather Underground. So, you're reading it here first.

Fulfilling the prophecy, Buckley resigned from the National Review yesterday amidst a Republican issued "Fatwah." As Buckley puts it:

My last posting (if that's what it's called) in which I endorsed Obama, has brought about a very heaping helping of fresh hell. In fact, I think it could accurately be called a tsunami.

The mail (as we used to call it in pre-cyber times) at the Beast has been running I'd say at about 7-to-1 in favor. This would seem to indicate that you (the Beast reader) are largely pro-Obama.

As for the mail flooding into National Review Online--that's been running about, oh, 700-to-1 against. In fact, the only thing the Right can't quite decide is whether I should be boiled in oil or just put up against the wall and shot. Lethal injection would be too painless.

According to Buckley, the National Review's Rich Lowry-types were eager to accept his resignation.

I have to admit that I'm a little proud of myself for spotting the first thoughtful, reasonable conservative sighted outside of captivity since 2000. And I'm pleasantly taken aback by his objectively unflattering assessment of the conservative movement I know and loathe:

So, I have been effectively fatwahed (is that how you spell it?) by the conservative movement, and the magazine that my father founded must now distance itself from me. But then, conservatives have always had a bit of trouble with the concept of diversity. The GOP likes to say it's a big-tent. Looks more like a yurt to me.

Wow. Buckley's kid. Formerly of National Review fame. Calling 'em like he sees 'em. But the best part of his Dear John letter to the National Review is this well-rounded skewering of all things Republican:

While I regret this development (his resignation), I am not in mourning, for I no longer have any clear idea what, exactly, the modern conservative movement stands for. Eight years of "conservative" government has brought us a doubled national debt, ruinous expansion of entitlement programs, bridges to nowhere, poster boy Jack Abramoff and an ill-premised, ill-waged war conducted by politicians of breathtaking arrogance. As a sideshow, it brought us a truly obscene attempt at federal intervention in the Terry Schiavo case.

So, to paraphrase a real conservative, Ronald Reagan: I haven't left the Republican Party. It left me.

This guy is an Ariana Huffington in the making. I give him three months before he's running his own librul blog.

Here's video of Buckley on Harball last night (thanks Lauren S!):



Display:


Unfortunately for National Review... (2.00 / 4)

...I'm betting that the elder Buckley would be voting Obama, too, had he survived.

Why?  Because he wasn't an idiot.  He was more and more disillusioned with the conservative movement and their excesses and wars of "convenience."  He knew that these weren't the conservatives that he had spent his life building.

Buckley the Younger has a bright future ahead of him, if he becomes a leader of the Obama Republicans.


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 08:37:00 AM EST

In WFBs formative years (2.00 / 7)

The Democrats were the party of the South. East Coasts Elites forced desegregation down the throat of the South so they jumped ship to the Buckley-esque Republicans.

The Great Sin was that the Republicans of the North made a deal with the Southern Racist devil. Over time the Democratic party became the party of the shrinking North and the South began to dominate politics, to the entire nation's detriment.

Now that they have been kicked to the back of the bus along with the rest of us, the Buckley types are "discovering" just how shitty the Southern Republicans are.

They can see only now what the rest of us have known since the Arch-Fiend Nixon? Had they honor they would have accepted defeat rather than opened the door to Dixie.

Reagan Democrats have to recall that it was Southern "right to work" laws that began the exodus of jobs from the North. Not that the jobs stayed in Dixie; Clinton and the Southern Congressional Majority rammed through NAFTA et. al. and jobs left for Mexico and then China.

The Wal-Martization of America is also a Southern phenomena. We need to remind "Joe Six Pack" and "Sally Soccer Mom" of that when they are standing in line with their peers for a chance at becoming a part time greeter at Wal Mart. Only by restoring the cultural and political ascendancy of the Yankee can we return America to the greatness built.. wait for it... by the Yankees.

That was America the Great.


by Paul Goodman on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 10:47:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

As a former FL resident living in exile in PA... (2.00 / 2)

I wholeheartedly agree.


by Bob Sackamento on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 10:52:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: In WFBs formative years (2.00 / 4)

I agree with your assessment of Southern Republicans. And though I'm tempted to join you in cheering on pro-Yankee sentiment, I think it's a good idea not to sharpen the North/South divide. If you thought the primary wars were a dead horse, you'd have to witness civil-war era resentments in these parts (North Carolina). That NC is now a swing state will almost certainly be blamed on the Yankee invasion.


It is not because I cannot explain that you won't understand. It is because you won't understand that I cannot explain. - Elie Wiesel
by Sumo Vita on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Whoo boy, did you ever (2.00 / 2)

hit the nail on the head there, Paul.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 12:11:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NR Eats Young: Buckley Resigns (2.00 / 4)

the elder would not have, he was really a racist, although he 'gave it up' when he realized it made him unpopular, Sarah is just finding out.  

The conservative pugs think they have brilliant theorists behind them, think of themselves as the intellectuals of the nation, the real elite and they're blissfully unaware of there own unwarranted but oh so elitist assumptions.

Kids are less racist, way less, they're better positioned to listen and some of their 'elders.'


what a relief
by anna shane on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 10:10:19 AM EST

Great! (2.00 / 2)

Great to see the right wing demoralized and warring against each other. Let the bloodshed begin!


Dizzy Zzyzzy
by Zzyzzy on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 01:39:45 PM EST

NR Eats Young (2.00 / 2)

No doubt Hillary Clinton would have brought strengths to the current campaign that Obama doesn't have, but I'm glad to see that Obama's advertised cross-partisan appeal is turning out to be very, very real.

He's pulling over about half of the Republican intelligentsia and way more than his share of conservative-leaning independants.


If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way.
by Jess81 on Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 07:21:40 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.